Spoken communication is more important than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, with the extensive development of technology, there have been a variety of more convenient options for human communication. Therefore, the difference in effectiveness between speaking and writing has been narrowed considerably. However, part of the society still support the statement that using speech actually outweigh writing unnecessarily drearily long essays. And I am of the opinion that in reality, speeches bring more advantages over writings in the field of effective communication.
Firstly, there must be saying that writing skill has made a huge contribution to the precious source of human academic materials. Dating back to thousands of centuries, while humankind was troubled with transferring essential information by their speech, writing on stones emerged as a breakthrough solution because it can be preserved permanently. By the way, a great of valuable knowledge and living experiences relating to struggling with natural disasters, growing proper crops, hunting wild animals are handed down to the younger generations accurately and straightforwardly. So, in almost all stages of human evolution, communicating through meticulously recorded documents has never lost its importance.
Nevertheless, I am inclined to approve of the statement that a suitable speaking skill will make the human communication better and more persuasive. The line of reasoning for that lies in the fact that speaking can put us into a highly-interactive environment where we grasp the hardest information most fluently. More than that, when we encounter worrying knowledge from others, we can immediately have the chance to discuss with them in depth. If it works well, we can be able to memorize that kind of information logically in the long term.
To sum up, it should be affirmed that every form of communication function well in its own way. While the existence of written information is guaranteed for sure without losing its applicability, making use of spreading it by appropriate speeches can ensure that it will be transferred and discussed most effectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sferred and discussed most effectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, while, kind of, by the way, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52336448598 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32284137935 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629283489097 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4774161409 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.642857143 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0883389259955 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306011327322 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366709137934 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0523602660318 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209875989171 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.