Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that information exchanging in the form of speech surpasses doing in the form of text. I completely agree with this view, regardless of special or normal circumstances.
First of all, I strongly believe that spoken interaction is not inferior to written communication even when it comes to formal events. In summits or conferences, for instance, speech plays a crucial role in terms of negotiating and ideas sharing, while writing-related approaches are scarcely used for those purposes. One may maintain that written documents are easier to archive and retrieve compared to oral data, but they fail to realize that nowadays recording and extracting of the prior spoken conversation are preferable and prevalent, thanks to advancements of the technology. Moreover, official messages may be conveyed more efficiently to the public by word-of-mouth rather than by pieces of writing. National statements or new policies are cases in point, would be better disseminated by talks on the media, instead of by intricate and implicit passages of words since people may find it baffling and impatient to read those administrative documents.
At the same time, I would argue that in daily situations, oral communication is also far more powerful than the written counterpart. The first reason is that speaking allows people to impart and feedback information immediately, which is time-saving and boosts the efficiency of the discussion process. The best illustrations for this view are phone calls, outweighing email and text messages in the aspect of instant connection. And obviously, emotions expressing can be exactly achieved by verbal format, but not by words written. Furthermore, provided that writing is rather formal to utilize in ordinary circumstances, speaking is more comfortable and preeminent for daily interaction. Without inclining to correct mistakes in others’ speech, informal utterances encourage people to engage and thus catalyze the interaction process to progress faster and further.
In conclusion, it seems to me that speaking, with more advantages in conveying the ideas, either officially or ordinarily, would outperform writing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61818181818 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19429588028 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615151515152 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5189681732 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156818847123 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491965824092 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057229251471 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784758400334 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282357366059 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.