Students leave high school without learning about how to manage their money. What are the reasons for this? What can be improved in students’ understanding of how to manage their finances?
Pupils have always had trouble in managing money. The rooted causes could be in curriculum or parents’ manners. To address this issue, schools and families can take some measures which I express now.
The reasons of lacking financial knowledge students in graduated students can conceptualize in two aspects. In term of curriculum, the taught subjects in schools are more theoretical than practical. For example, they learn math, probability and logic, but they rarely have been told how they can use these subjects in their daily life to generate revenue. Having considering families, parents mostly put pressure on their children to study hard and get brilliant scores, because they believe pursuing education in university would guarantee their children’s future life.
In order to overcome this problem two solutions are recommended. By adding practical subjects, workshops, and inviting financial experts, pupils can learn how wisely invest in stock market or set up a company. Besides, they would be able to calculate the benefits of a project and decide whether get a loan for that or reject it. Furthermore, parents should tempt their children to take risk and step outside their comfort zone. They should relief the pressure on students because teenagers could be successful even if not enter to the university. Lastly, teachers could encourage students to take a part time, as it can broaden students’ mind and horizon by exposing different issues.
In conclusion, I suppose, the causes of deficits of finance knowledge are rooted in the presented subjects at school and parents’ behaviors. This issue could be dealt by conducting some workshops and changing in parents’ manners.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have rarely been
...n math, probability and logic, but they rarely have been told how they can use these subjects in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...hers could encourage students to take a part time, as it can broaden students’ mind and h...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, lastly, so, for example, i suppose, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37827715356 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7690088695 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629213483146 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6154885696 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274740388362 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783664135457 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383273446665 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147642088678 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500242712866 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.