Some people consider increase in prices of fuel and vehicles as the best solution for environmental problems. In my opinion, although it can decrease some negative effects on environment, it is not the best way to resolve environmental problems.
Generally, the globe has been faced various problems environmentally and these problems has been exacerbated in recent decade due to globalization, industrial activities, economic growth of countries, etc. In fact, a wide range of activities and issues leads to negative effects on environment and causes problems. In this regard, solving these type of problems is complicated and requires an integrated and comprehensive set of solutions.
Increase in number of vehicles and fuel consumption is one of the factors which mentioned as the reason of environmental problems’ exacerbation. Thus, applying some strategies like increase prices of vehicles and fuels has been suggested as a way for solving environmental problems. But this kind of strategies cannot be recognized as the best solutions because pricing will be a doubled-edged sword itself. In other word, in one hand it can have some positive impacts on demand of vehicles and accordingly on environmental issues and on the other hand causes some other problems. it may result in an increasing trend in environmental problems.
In conclusion, despite of the positive effect of increase in fuel and vehicles prices on environmental problems, it cannot be the best way to overcome the environmental challenges. As a matter of fact, if the pricing strategy is executed along with other solutions in an integrated framework regarding various aspects of each solution. Also responses to these solutions, it can lead to a remarkable decision making and problem solving processes which decline the environmental deterioration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... other hand causes some other problems. it may result in an increasing trend in en...
^^
Line 4, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rding various aspects of each solution. Also responses to these solutions, it can le...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, may, regarding, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a matter of fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49290780142 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32317941927 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492907801418 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8193987964 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.153846154 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351357284384 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141404180954 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11104354166 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24165392384 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112891468206 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.