Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking, or dressing should not be taught.
To what extent do you agree/disagree?
Some people hold a belief that school should be a place where students study academic subjects to pass the examination rather than to learn skills such as dressing or cookery. As far as my concern, I partly disagree with this opinion. In spite of the significance of academic knowledge and exams, student should be taught other fundamental skills for life.
First of all, studying academic knowledge is not only vital for student in examination’s results but can also in tertiary education and job opportunities. With good results, students have an more advantages in their job prospect in the future because their academic performance after many years of study is appreciated by employers. Moreover, academic subjects equip students with fundamental knowledge that will be used in university or some training courses in particular job. For example, Vietnamese students have to study many subjects at school and pass final exams before getting into university. Without a deep understanding basic knowledge in school, it is hard for student have a good career orientation or master and doctor qualification in the future.
However, learning practical skills is helpful for students who lives far from family. Foreign students need to prepare healthy and affordable meals themselves instead of eating out at restaurants which is costly. Moreover, attending practical skill classes at school is also an effective way for students to relax after many hours of studying academic subjects. Through a wide range of activities, students are able to find out their suitable hobbies in their leisure time which can create a better life style for them.
In conclusion, I disagree that students should be taught academic knowledge to pass exam only, and practical skills is not necessary to be taught for students because both sectors give student some particular benefits in the future such as job prospects, tertiary education and better life style.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-23 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Trangdodo | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-03 | supermanminh512 | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | Nguyen Hung | 56 | view |
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 89
- It is neither possible nor useful for the government to provide university places for a large proportion of students To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught To what extent do you agree disagree 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 61
- Some universities are offering online courses as an alternative to classes delivered in campus Is this a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ities. With good results, students have an more advantages in their job prospect i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31493506494 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81468415125 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548701298701 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8199936453 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.923076923 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316655884673 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121443330786 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118114527774 0.0667982634062 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246291754558 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137697295922 0.056905535591 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.