studies show that criminals get a low level of education. Some people believe that the best way to reduce the crime is educating people in prison so they can get a job after leaving prison. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Crime often comes in tandem with illiteracy in a community. accordingly, one school of thought is of the opinion that educating criminals while doing time will lessen the rate of recidivism since it makes criminals more employable . My sentiment is on pair with this opinion. The effectiveness of such an approach will be proven by looking at some probable consequences of this solution.
Firstly, vocational education is usually hailed as a key to prevent prison inmates from coming into contact with the law again. To illustrate, based on global statistics, prison inmates who acquired some necessary occupational skills, while locked up in jail, reveal a relevantly lower law infringement after resuming their ordinary lives outside prisons. The reason seems clear: having access to secure job positions and earning substantially obviates the need to break the law to live a life.
Secondly, learning can change people's mindset as it is proven that our brain is plastic enough even after maturity. That is because human's brain is scientifically proven to be able to reshape over the lifespan. Therefore, since the provenance of a majority of these criminals is penniless families who could not afford a decent education before being handcuffed, they'd better be given an opportunity to learn productively. As a result, believing in the rehabilitation possibility of these criminals, especially those of petty crimes, justifies the efforts made to exposed prisoners to proper education. Thus, the opportunity to introduce prisoners to a new perception of life should be embraced by authorities.
By contrast, prison education programs are not without opposition and there is often little public sympathy for prisoners. Arguments made against prison education mostly include that inmates do not deserve the right to be educated; doing so is being "soft on crime", and that it is a waste of taxpayers' money. However, it should be noted that this provided training is a rewarding remedy which might save more than it costs since it is can bring criminals to repentance.
To conclude, prison education not only can change an individual's personality but also it will teach them the necessary skills to work after their release. Hence, this will reduce recidivism as a prior goal of incarceration, so it seems advisable to fund such a means in order to keep communities safe.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Accordingly
... tandem with illiteracy in a community. accordingly, one school of thought is of the opinio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...since it makes criminals more employable . My sentiment is on pair with this opini...
^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they'd
...cent education before being handcuffed, theyd better be given an opportunity to learn...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...prison education not only can change an individuals personality but also it will teach them...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29473684211 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98959924625 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607894736842 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.647876798 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.352941176 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200823100731 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559008396059 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353589700753 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101861745399 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225078326241 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.