Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.
Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
It is sometimes argued that famous sports professionals such as Cristiano Ronaldo, Messi or David Beckham... can ear great deal more money than people has contribute important in the society. The main reason for the issue is that attention of media on them. Some people think that this is complete suitable for them. However, other people think that it is unfair with person who contribute more for society like doctors or scientist.
On the one hand, some people believe that successfai sports professionals can earn a lot of money is fully justified. I agree with this opinion. I think that they did more exercise and get many trouble to successfully in today. Besides, they use all their efforts to bring win for their country. They make their country more development than other countries. In addition, their successfully attracted attention of media. They not only contribute efforts for sport,but also advertising for many well-known brand. So, they can earn a lot of money is fully justified.
On the other hand, many people think that sports professionals does not more contribute to the society like doctors or scientist. For instance, doctors make a great contribute to the society by treating and injured people. Furthermore, the scientist who find new invention and climate change also contribute more for the society. However, the salary of they lowest then famous sports professionals.
Personally, I think that the sports professionals also contribution more to the society by donate more money for poor chidlren and orphan children, they also usually embark activities charity. So, I believe that everyone like sports professionals, doctor or scientist always contribute to the society by different way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'contributed'.
Suggestion: contributed
...r great deal more money than people has contribute important in the society. The main reas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun trouble seems to be countable; consider using: 'many troubles'.
Suggestion: many troubles
...ink that they did more exercise and get many trouble to successfully in today. Besides, they...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 463, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...ey not only contribute efforts for sport,but also advertising for many well-known br...
^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...le. Furthermore, the scientist who find new invention and climate change also contribute more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'they the lowest'.
Suggestion: they the lowest
...for the society. However, the salary of they lowest then famous sports professionals. Pers...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, well, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26545454545 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83656409548 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483636363636 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3364548372 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.2105263158 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4736842105 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305377457064 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107265710391 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935839384659 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202758515398 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827700083723 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.