Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think is fully justified while others think it is unfair.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The issue of whether top athletes should earn the enormous amounts of money they do or not is a debatable one. Some argue that they deserve it, others are convinced that they do not. For the purpose of this essay, both views will be scrutinised before reaching a reasonable conclusion.
On one side, those who agree with the former opinion provide a variety of reasons to justify their point of view. However, their chief reason is that famous sportsmen and women work hard to achieve the level of professionalism they have. For instance, many renowned soccer players had to cross many hurdles to perfect their eye-body coordination. Furthermore, they provide the people with a magnificent source of entertainment. That is to say, that no one can imagine their TVs without at least one sports channel.
Nevertheless, those people who oppose the first view, who think that the great people in sports should not get paid as much, present their respective points as well. The most significant is that many of the cornerstone professions, like teaching and research, can be better supported if we took some of the athletes pay and invested it in those major areas. I have to agree with this point. As most of the sports are for entertainment and cost a lot of money, mainly because of athletes’ salaries, much of this money can be used to fund a better infrastructure for fundamental issues in countries.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against high salaried sportspeople, but I stand behind the view that it is not fair to give these massive amounts of money to some people while allowing other main sectors to suffer. Therefore, I believe that a reconstruction of the pay scale is in order.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...rch, can be better supported if we took some of the athletes pay and invested it in those m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, at least, for instance, in conclusion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91467576792 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84994992694 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59385665529 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1803894598 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.857142857 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226876131784 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640253526707 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611090358256 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131202826761 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474783437211 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.