Everybody want to be happy in their life and cooperative with society. Majority of people believe that diminishing the difference between income among people will bring happiness to the society. I completely agree with this view with some supportive opinion.
The separation between one and another by their income is the major drawbacks of a society. Because of this poor people are unable to cooperative with all stages of people. Provided that it is reduced people of all stages will be more friendly with one another and they will be feel happy. Furthermore, there are some people who I want to help every sector of people, however, they are not eligible to do so just because this difference. As a result, people are getting less help from helpers and feel wanting of aid. Suppose that separation through earning is decrease, people will be more helpful and gladness will in every house.
In other words, a person who has higher income among the society he would take care of destitute family by giving some money. It will bring less difference among those families and both will feel jubilant. For instance, in our society in your locality mayor see all the of the inhabitants in a neutral view. That is why everyone in our society feel happy. Moreover status of every people should not be judged by their income. People will feel sad when they notice that they are not able to contact with wealthy person or family, so he did not feel in his life pleasant. Through reducing differences would be a way to make them happy.
To put in a nutshell, reducing the difference between destitute and wealthy people in society is a great way to bring happiness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...me is the major drawbacks of a society. Because of this poor people are unable to coope...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...why everyone in our society feel happy. Moreover status of every people should not be ju...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78819444444 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46115412161 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489583333333 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6983682984 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1176470588 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13357792243 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509441422927 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467475887382 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108824214836 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420157638504 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.