Friendship in this era has faced an immense alteration because of advent of new technology. People don’t tend to have face to face interaction. Instead they opt to make friends through social media or other means. To me, this trend doesn’t seem appealing since it would contribute negative effects either on individuals and communities.
Firstly, it is often argued that individuals are less social than before in the light of the fact that making friends is going to be more virtually. They less adore having family or friend reunions. So this laziness impacts on the way people have company. For example, before this people should participate in festivals or parties in order to see more newcomers, although now it could be meet mere by starting up the smartphones applications in a very short times. However, people should do something regarding issue. Maybe social network is more convenient, but it could not communicate the sensations and feelings.
Secondly, when it comes to making family, the new policy of people relationship would result in hazardous effects on future of societies. Reportedly, the rate of marriage is sharply soaring in comparison with former years. Besides, mentors claim that this is because of spread of possession companionship through internet. For instance, according to the recent survey by Tehran University sixty seven percent of marriages that stem from social networks lead to divorce. So government ought to take prompt actions with regard to informing young about this sophisticated issue.
Put it into a nutshell, it could be perceived out of this essay that technology would not only make individuals be far from society, but also would bring about a raise in the proportion of the marriage in the communities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
... tend to have face to face interaction. Instead they opt to make friends through social...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...eople have company. For example, before this people should participate in festivals ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'time'?
Suggestion: time
...martphones applications in a very short times. However, people should do something re...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: sixty-seven
... the recent survey by Tehran University sixty seven percent of marriages that stem from soc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24647887324 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85947580243 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619718309859 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.987590402 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181801948534 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560108291239 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438188244836 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098968874675 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028260647833 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.