Modern technology has provided us with numerous mediums of communication. With the advent of computers and the internet, people rely greatly on technology. This has caused a transformation of relationships as well. This essay will discuss the positive and negative effects of this development.
For instance, these days people are using smartphones not just for placing calls but also for video chats, photo sharing, and to play games online. They can instantly connect with their loved ones who are residing in different countries and it is not possible for them to meet more often. Moreover, with the help of social media, people are able to find their friends from schools and colleges. Also, they have the ability to create groups and events, where they can quickly reach out by using direct messaging and can update each other. Additionally, people who are introvert, they can find new friends by using platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat.
Nevertheless, there are countless drawbacks as well. For example, people consider it easier to connect over video chat rather than putting efforts to meet their friends in person, which may create distance in relationships. Also, it is evident that people are adding more connections on social media, but they lack actual emotions and empathy. In addition to this, they tend to overshare information on the internet, which make them prone to identity and data theft, also the fraudulent activities have increased as people are putting their personal details over the internet.
To recapitulate, from my point of view technology has certainly improved communication among friends and families. However, people must use the modes of communication which are more safe and secure.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31046931408 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78354567471 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595667870036 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.103458535 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187068523641 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646201951396 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333152024777 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114778920738 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505778565036 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.