Is technology time-consuming or does it save time?
Since electronic devices were improved, individuals have been using them for their various needs. During these years of their usage, it is argue whether they have had benefits or drawbacks on spending people’s time. I myself think technology has propelled people to both save time and to over consume based on some reasons which will be clarified later.
To commence with, nobody could able to overlook technology benefits for humans especially not to waste their time. Since applications and social media were appealed, people have been able to carry diverse duties in limited period of time. For example, instead of wasting a great deal of time in banks to deposit amount of money, nowadays individuals have been able to do every of their bank activities not only in their home, but also in less amount of time. Consequently, technology has been extremely effective for people when it comes to argent actions and restricted period of time, therefore they have been saving their precious time by utilizing electronic devices.
On the other hand, although developed tools such as computers have had perfect impacts on people’s lives, it has led them to over consume their time. In today’s world, it has been impossible to live without technology because of lots of its usages, but it has made any person with any age group not to use their time effectively and practically. For instance, people have been playing with their computers or surfing on internet particularly in social Medias for no specific purpose. As a result, lots of moments have been wasted just by searching on the internet.
In conclusion, exactly like every issue which has both worthy and adverse effects on people, technology has not been exceptional. Despite all the negative aspects such as consuming much amount of time, it has had more benefits in this specific subject based on writer’s opinion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'argued'.
Suggestion: argued
...uring these years of their usage, it is argue whether they have had benefits or drawb...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...able to carry diverse duties in limited period of time. For example, instead of wasting a grea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 571, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... comes to argent actions and restricted period of time, therefore they have been saving their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, look, so, therefore, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09032258065 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59463145416 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8874917579 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.384615385 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301236713021 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122010103851 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907740517608 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202367569934 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565473973824 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.