in their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways. Why is this? Do you think this is a positive or negative development.
Hitherto, the dramatic globalization has led to an increase in the quality of products advertising, and questions of the ground purpose for this development and whether this evolution brings our society benefits or drawbacks have been raising public attention. While many people lament that this is absolutely the negative development, I will overlook these lucrativeness by giving some rational reasons.
Go back into the past, when the manufacture market was in saturated period, many businesses made effort to have customers’ appealing which can create more income and resilient after the economic unstable time. They tried to advertise via traditional ways like: Bringing their items directly to customers’ accommodation where the rate of buying products is the highest or making banners. But they soon realized that customers are always be interested by new useful products, so advertising their goods as the newest on the world was the uppermost way to sell items.
On the one hand, this advertising method may put the businesses’ economic in danger. The new items can vanish prevailing goods from selling market, for example: In America a few years ago, there was a economic crisis due to the excess of domestic products in their houses, therefore, the price of those items dropped significantly and create a sluggish developing period in America. Furthermore, the latest not means the best, although many high-tech products are introduced in selling field, there are a tons of foreseeable drawbacks in these items. One of the most vivid evidences is that the house cleaning robot, this machine can make residents’ houses become clean without consuming human physical strength, however, it super slow and unnecessary because human can do it faster and cleaner.
In conclusion, the demand for new products in the manufacture market is expanding, however, we must carried out the survey of whether this goods can appeal human’s interest or not before introduce it to citizens
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this lucrativeness' or 'these lucrativenesses'?
Suggestion: this lucrativeness; these lucrativenesses
...e negative development, I will overlook these lucrativeness by giving some rational reasons. Go ba...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...: In America a few years ago, there was a economic crisis due to the excess of do...
^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a ton' or simply 'tons'?
Suggestion: a ton; tons
... introduced in selling field, there are a tons of foreseeable drawbacks in these items...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... must carried out the survey of whether this goods can appeal human’s interest or no...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35031847134 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87286566588 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643312101911 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0634136096 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.0 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253453452736 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938659455421 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437707430791 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139808444299 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288092153531 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.