In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways.
Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In the modern days, many companies and corporates usually release particular products labeling them trendy or admitting them the latest version in their own explanation. There are some reasonable justifications for this tactic, to cite public attraction or sales promotion. Simultaneously, in my own opinion, this strategy also brings two different outcomes for the businesses themselves.
It is quite understandable that companies often introduce their products as new and catchy. As the main goal of most businesses is to make as much profit as possible, this marketing strategy plays a pivotal role to achieve their resolutions. For instance, a new iPhone with new camera techniques and designs will attract a big amount of clients and customers to purchase new iPhones, explicating that they are catchy and fashionable. As a result, this will bring Apple a big fortune. Moreover, when introducing new products, many companies which have the potential can have the opportunity to receive foreign capital investment, which will raise the company's net value and reputation.
On the one hand, this game plan brings both benefits and risks to businesses. For big organizations which outrun their rivalries companies with the latest high-quality products, they can lead and take control of the stock market, hold the future trends and receive a bunch of followers and supporters who psychologically abet advancement and rapid changes. However, if the company's new products are not noticeable and conspicuous enough, not only do they lose money but also throw away their public position and reputation.
In conclusion, this essay explains the reasons for businesses introducing their products as new and up-to-date, it also recognizes the benefits and risks involved in this strategy. While the justifications and positivity of this tactic are rational, it requires the value so as to proclaim the products’ advancements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 273, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...tic are rational, it requires the value so as to proclaim the products’ advancements.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48484848485 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10084375708 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582491582492 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5643832226 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.307692308 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257201140304 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951161097057 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574036574395 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165277157439 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327846416801 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.