There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home. This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In this fast-changing world, distance learning and working have become one of the most challengeable issues. Although I accepted the positive points of this trend, I believe adverse effects are more significant.
Many workers and students tend to work and educate from home because they argue it is more efficient and beneficial. They think by implementing this method individuals can save up more time due to the diminishment in the distance that must be travelled. the more time saved, the more efficiently can be achieved. Furthermore, students and workers have more freedom in time planning. Take a student who has more tendency to study at nights as an example; he tends to accomplish his assignment whenever he wants because there is not any compulsory schedule.
Although learning and working from home can cause some positive development, I think the dire consequences are more considerable. Not only can distance activities cause desperation, but it also can compromise social communication and contact maintaining. Working in workplaces and studying in the educational atmosphere surge people’s inclination to do teamwoke while by distance working people are more likely to exposure to mental problems, due to reduced communication. Take a student having eager for going school peresently as an example; by distance learning the friendly communication and learning desire will be lost, and he is enforced to online communication which is not recommended for children.
To sum up, for the reasons mentioned above, I think distance learning is not a potent option in exchange for face to face activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...in the distance that must be travelled. the more time saved, the more efficiently c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, i think, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4094488189 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13697269373 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57874015748 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6776303927 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345564829996 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140596019517 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107811924178 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180443510055 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124566355048 0.056905535591 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.