There is no need for printed books, magazines, and newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, it is claimed that paper-based reading materials, such as books, magazines or newspapers are no longer necessary. Personally, I firmly belief that these forms of reading are not useful and should not be produced.
For a variety of reasons, traditional books, newspapers or magazines may bring certain drawbacks to the modern world. To begin with, these types of materials are often considered environmentally harmful. To explain, in order to produce printed reading materials, it is necessary to acquire paper, which is made from wood or timber. In other words, higher demand for paper books or newspaper will result in increased exploitation of natural resources, particularly trees, for paper production process. Ultimately, these actions, including deforestation, can damage the evironment, leaving several irreversibly adverse impacts, such as imbalanced ecosystem due to land disruption the lack of plants in the forest.
Apart from the abovementioned practical concerns, the production for conventional books or newspapers should be reduced due to its downsides. To elaborate, paper books or newspapers often take up spaces for storage, potentially leading to a waste of empty space if individuals attepmt to collect a great number of books or newspapers for their personal hobbies. Even more importantly, these paper materials will certainly deteriorate through time if not well preserved, resulting in a waste of financial resources, especially for people with low incomes.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that even though printed books, newspapers or magazines still hold a role in modern era, the demand for these reading materials is expected to gradually diminish in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, still, well, apart from, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71102661597 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15818781418 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619771863118 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0087595633 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.545454545 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212199998651 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784932243309 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614736481934 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128269095971 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282081122089 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.