these days, mobile phones and Internet's are important to the ways in which people relate with one another socially. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages
In recent times, the use of handsets and internet as means of socialization is becoming increasingly popular. While there are some drawbacks with the use of phones and online access like cyber crime, a break in face to face interaction between people, the benefits to humans are enormous when compares to the negative effects. This will be explain in the following paragraphs
There are a few draw demerits regarding the use of electronic gadgets and internet access. Firstly, because of the advances in technology world, Criminals now see the use of phones and internet as avenue to perpetuate there heinous acts by involving in cyber crimes. This has lead to a lot of individuals falling victims of online fraud. For instance, a report released by the economic financial crime commission, revealed that about 70% of individuals who carried out online transactions, were victims of online scam. Again, mobile phone and internet access have reduce the importance of social gathering amongst peers because such meetings can be held online and as conference calls. Consequently, peers hardly see the need to visit each other creating a gap in face to face interactions.
Having said the above, there a lot of benefits derived from the rise in the use of handsets and accessing the internet. One of such positive effects of the use of electronics includes easy means of communications. One can easily interacts with another individual from the convenient of his or her home by simply putting a call forward to the other person. This has made life very interesting. For instance, a father can reach his son in the university in another city from the comfort of his home by dialing the phone digits of the son. In addition, because of the portability of phones, students can surf the internet for information, from the beds, making study enjoyable.
In conclusion, although there few negatives from the use of phone and internet, such as cyber crime and a breach in visual interaction between friends, its advantageous effect such as convenient of interaction and educative role are more exclusive
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mes, the use of handsets and internet as means of socialization is becoming incre...
^^
Line 4, column 565, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
..., mobile phone and internet access have reduce the importance of social gathering amon...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 230, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'interact'
Suggestion: interact
...means of communications. One can easily interacts with another individual from the conve...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...communications. One can easily interacts with another individual from the conveni...
^^
Line 6, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vidual from the convenient of his or her home by simply putting a call forward to...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from the beds, making study enjoyable. In conclusion, although there few negati...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, regarding, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08092485549 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85154532996 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537572254335 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4689961363 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.2 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124813909561 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040009670236 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322397095567 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744568510171 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146029582507 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.