Today, TV channels show more men’s sports than women’s sports. Why is this the case? Should TV channels give equal time to women’s sports and men’s sports?
In this day and age, it is an irony that sports channels broadcasting women's competitions are fewer than men's. This phenomenon is caused by various culprits and to resolve this, TV channels should give equal time to women’s sports and men’s sports.
There are numerous reasons for inequality in the quantity of women's and men's sports programs on TV. First and foremost, due to recent research in several cities in Germany, the vast majority of sports channel viewers are men or boys. This means that they tend to watch sports competitions in which male players are on the court in view of the common assumption that men's sports bring excitement and thrill. Particularly, men are usually thought to be physically stronger and faster than women, leading to the fact that men's matches are more appealing. This results in another factor contributing to the dominance of male sports when TV channels are inclined to broadcast only events relevant to men to maximize their ratings and profits.
However, I firmly hold the view that there should be equity in the broadcast time of men's and women's sports games. This would be a significant step in the progress of building gender equality in society when the airtime of women is relatively the same as men. With respect to the most noticeable benefit, a better living standard in females' lives should be mentioned as it enables women to earn from the sports viewers investment. To give a clearer view, recently, the national female football team of Vietnam has donated a large amount of money and presents from the home fans, which brought them both mental and physical enjoyment.
In conclusion, there are ample contributions to a large number of TV sports programs nowadays associated with men. While this seems to have some advantages, I believe that it is mandatory that female and male sports games be given equal broadcasting time.
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this 84
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 78
- In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 84
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions 73
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...usion, there are ample contributions to a large number of TV sports programs nowadays associated ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97784810127 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6110088105 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563291139241 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9111109157 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.580289993062 0.244688304435 237% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224765917401 0.084324248473 267% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114947558162 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.382781737643 0.151304729494 253% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128289102812 0.056905535591 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.