It is observed by many that increased demand of electronic books has adversely affected the sale of offline copies. While former scheme offers some benefits, it would also have few drawbacks.
Studying anything on mobile and laptops provides more convenience and flexibility. To put it simply, when someone access any resource online, this can be done anywhere, anytime and at any place they feel like, eventually promoting greater learning experience making the complete process interesting. Secondly, discussed mode is highly environment friendly as negligible paper is used. Consequently, trees and forests exploitation would be reduced, thereby making surrounding pretty clean, and enhancing oxygen level of the area and making it healthy place for survival. Hence, this channel of academics needs to be promoted.
On the other hand, utilising referred mode may cause health related problems. To begin with, eyes have to face lot of strain and pressure when exposed to the screens for prolonged duration of time. This can result into poor and impaired vision and occasionally complete loss at later stages of life. Moreover, there are far less features of marking, underlining and making personal notes which are available when someone uses paper books. As a result, productivity and memory retention declines affecting the grades in exams. Researches have proven that, individuals referring hard copies score better in their tests and have higher fitness levels.
In conclusion, paperless usage of resources is an effective and efficient way of enhancing flexibility and upgraded oxygen percentage in ambience. However, excessive usage of it could be detrimental to one's well-being and a balanced approach ought to be the optimal outcome.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'accesses'.
Suggestion: accesses
...ibility. To put it simply, when someone access any resource online, this can be done a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
..., eventually promoting greater learning experience making the complete process interesting...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun features is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...stages of life. Moreover, there are far less features of marking, underlining and ma...
^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ive usage of it could be detrimental to ones well-being and a balanced approach ough...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54104477612 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78789779884 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.712686567164 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0419895924 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0988230485309 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301019515769 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252632929285 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0510509481574 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308963262765 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.