Having social talent allows a person to interact in a manner, which makes it result oriented, precise and to the point. An effective communication done by an employee while working for big clients, creates better experience and an efficient exchange of information between business and employer. This further enhances the relations of two, thereby promoting increased revenue, sales, trust and an everlasting value.
Secondly, implementing referred skills in a team, gives a positive environment to a job, marking a sharp boost in productivity and culture ethics. A recent survey by ABC revealed that, companies having more headcount of associates who are highly influential and convincing, grow at a faster rate than their peers in market. Furthermore, this ability of them makes them very bright prospect in plethora of roles like managing a huge project, leading the group, organizing cultural activities at corporate level, inspiring people to deliver excellent results and mentoring.
Finally, these applicants can always be a fair ambassador of their firm and may campaign for, when it comes to choosing by users because they possess inherent quality of expressing and justifying. Generally, friend circle is also big for them, playing a vital role in spreading brand awareness to the larger population.
In conclusion, companies are justified in their strategy of laying priority on social talent over academic or related field knowledge, as sales volumes are excellent which ought to be of utmost importance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...liver excellent results and mentoring. Finally, these applicants can always be ...
^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...liver excellent results and mentoring. Finally, these applicants could always b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, as for, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2930.0 1615.20841683 181% => OK
No of words: 537.0 315.596192385 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45623836127 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94507680458 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.348230912477 0.561755894193 62% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 917.1 506.74238477 181% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1636197168 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.181818182 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4090909091 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77272727273 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.38176352705 228% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 8.67935871743 230% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134466461347 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472267896736 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351969750138 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0677925667312 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311213348594 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.