Topic: Some people argue that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and academic word. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Information security is a big concern of individuals and organizations, especially, in now digital technology era. Sharing information is a controversial topic. Some people think that information should be shared widely in science, business, and education. However, others argue that crucial information and invaluable information should be gained with some conditions. In my opinion, I believe that it would be better to have restrictions on having information.
On the one hand, some people like to gain information without difficulty for some reasons. Firstly, getting information freely in science, economy, and education might reduce the gap of development among countries. In other words, this is the key to improving life quality in developing countries. Secondly, the convenience of having information help to solve international problems. In an effort to prevent damages of climate change, for example, sharing information about experiences and knowledge among countries is necessary and it leads to saving time and effort to find effective ways. If there was not a co-operation in sharing information, climate change would be worse than it is. As a result, people feel there are no reasons to keep information secret.
One the other hand, I strongly believe that crucial and invaluable information just be obtained with specific conditions. The first reason is that finding invaluable information is much challenging as it demands not only time but also effort. If the information can be acquired freely, then the new one would never appear as a consequence of the discouragement of creativity. For instance, I am a language teacher and I invented an efficient way to help foreign people who want to learn my own language. Unfortunately, the information of my method was shared freely, then I could not find a convincing reason to invest my time in creation, although I know the availability of invaluable information might help more people. Furthermore, leaking crucial information, in some cases, is harmful to individuals and organizations because it has a big impact on personal lives and development or event national security of each country.
In conclusion, although the reasons for gaining information freely are convincing, I think information, especially, crucial and invaluable ones should be shared with particular requirements.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 8.3376753507 384% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52486187845 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28752494654 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524861878453 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.565263519 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.263157895 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94736842105 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322734694563 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114744037639 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810602815751 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221407126009 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795762381351 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.