In few nations, age is no longer considered as an important criterion for job application. In my opinion this is a negative development because not all genres of job suit every age group and hiring young talent at work can increase the productivity of the company.
Different types of jobs need different skill sets. Certain jobs need good physical fitness. For example, the construction workers may have to stand for long hours and lift heavy weight and the elderly job applicants may not be ready for such strenuous physical activity. Moreover, an elderly person cannot be expected to work as a construction labourer, with the same vigour as a young adult. In fact there is more chance of injury due to strenuous work in elderly. In a recent survey conducted in various industries, it was concluded that about 70% of medical compensation was spent on the labourers who are above 50 years of age.
Although the role of an experienced employ at work cannot be denied in few companies, there is a need to create opportunity for the younger generation to be in managerial roles. Recruiting young trainees, who with their innovative ideas improve productivity at work and hence the development of the company. For example, Google is hiring a lot of young applicants for the past few years, and each year the profits of the company are multiplied. In a recent interview the CEO of Google announced that despite a lot of competition among various companies, Google has secured a top position because of the refreshing and innovative ideas of the young recruited.
In conclusion, although in few countries, denying an applicant a job based on their age is considered as illegal, the fact that the elderly may not be suitable for all types of jobs cannot be neglected. The new generation should be given chances in the directorial roles for the company to prosper.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...y have to stand for long hours and lift heavy weight and the elderly job applicants may not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91455696203 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8549758804 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512658227848 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.742441329 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.928571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250256114297 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844174404172 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705220782327 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165776932844 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321235273142 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.