In few nations, age is no longer considered as an important criterion for job application. I think this is a negative development since not all kinds of job suit all age groups and hiring young talent at work can increase the productivity of the company.
Different kinds of jobs need different skill sets. Few jobs need good physical fitness and hence the elderly job applicants may not be ready for strenuous physical activity required for the job. An elderly cannot be expected to work as a construction labourer, lifting heavy weights with the same vigour as a young adult. There is often chance of injury due to strenuous work in elderly. In a recent survey conducted in various industries, it was concluded that about 70% of medical compensation was spent on the labourers above 50 years of age.
Though the role of an experienced employ at work cannot be denied in few companies, there is a need to create opportunity for the younger generation to be in managerial roles. Hiring young talents bring their innovative ideas, which lead to improved productivity at work and hence the development of the company. For example, Google is hiring a lot of young applicants for the past few years, and each year the profits of the company are multiplied. In a recent interview the CEO of Google announced that despite a lot of competition among various companies, Google has secured a top position because of the refreshing and innovative ideas of the young trainees.
In conclusion, though in few countries, denying an applicant a job based on their age is considered as illegal, the fact that the elderly may not be suitable for all types of jobs cannot be neglected. The new generation should be given chances in the directorial roles for the company to prosper.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87748344371 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81809868342 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519867549669 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.161939323 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.307692308 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246444804073 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879209132879 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742110012304 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164204681954 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032529661904 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.