In few nations, age is no longer considered as an important criterion for job application. I think this is a negative development since not all genres of job suit all age groups and employing young talent at work can increase the productivity of the company.
Different jobs need different skill sets. Few jobs may require the applicant to have good physical fitness. For instance, a construction worker may have to work long hours and lift heavy weights. The elderly job applicants may not be ready for such strenuous physical activity. Moreover, an old aged person cannot be expected to work with the same vigour as a young adult. There is often chance of injury due to strenuous work in elderly. In a recent survey conducted in various industries, it was concluded that about 70% of medical compensation was spent on the labourers who are above 50 years of age.
Though the role of an experienced employ at work cannot be denied in few companies, there is a need to create opportunity for the younger generation to be in managerial roles. The experienced person, who may be continuing the job for social security reasons, may not bring any benefits to the company. However, hiring young talents who with their innovative ideas, can improve productivity at work and hence the development of the company. For example, Google is recruiting more young applicants for the past few years, and each year the profits of the company are multiplied. In a recent interview the CEO of Google announced that despite extreme competition among various companies, Google has secured a top position because of the refreshing and innovative ideas of the young trainees.
In conclusion, though in few countries, denying an applicant a job based on their age is considered as illegal, the fact that the elderly may not be suitable for all types of jobs cannot be neglected. The new generation should be given chances in the directorial roles for the company to be prosperous.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95166163142 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8312461183 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528700906344 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5750693393 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244217395859 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851327406818 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597731559337 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165812241602 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021916544198 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.