Tourism is encouraged in many countries. Does tourism brings more advantages or disadvantages.
People throughout the world oppose enormous budget spending on developing tourism by the governments. However, recent research suggests that lack of focus on tourism development can be detrimental, and sufficient resources in traveling industry would be far more beneficial. In fact, positive impacts which come from tourism outweigh that of negative impacts. This essay will discuss both sides using example of Hong Kong government and Oxford University to demonstrate the points and prove arguments.
A fundamental reason is that although a huge amount of resources invest in tourism, economic growth is enhanced by promoting this industry. The central reason behind this is twofold, firsty, the tourism industry provides astonishing income to the country. For instance in Hong Kong, the government indicates that the hotel and tourism sector contributes 80 percent of gross domestic product in the year 2020, and continue to rise till now. Moreover, unless the communities encourage tourism development, it will not have sufficient job vacancies to the communities. Possibly because of relative salary of other industry is not attractive to youth people who are fresh graduates, tourism is their first priority for seeking the jobs. As a result, it is conclusively clear that constructive outcomes are brought by tourism.
Furthermore, cultural perspective is beneficial by flighting more resources on tourism. This is largely because a plethora of traveling attractions are involving local cultures, if maintaining culture services is extremely significant, the government should satisfies the demands of labour to work on it. There is an intensive research by Oxford University indicates that the local culture would be faded out if the government does not have sufficient budget on developing tourism. Consistent with this line of consideration, dissatisfaction level of inhabitants will be skyrocketed by the lack support in tourism industry. Therefore, it is preferable to put more focus on this industry.
To recapitulate, despite people tend to spend resource on the industry rather than tourism, tourism are crucial industry in providing economic growth and maintain local culture as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...resources in traveling industry would be far more beneficial. In fact, positive i...
^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...use a plethora of traveling attractions are involving local cultures, if maintaining culture ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'satisfy'
Suggestion: satisfy
...mely significant, the government should satisfies the demands of labour to work on it. Th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'intensive research'.
Suggestion: intensive research
...mands of labour to work on it. There is an intensive research by Oxford University indicates that the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wth and maintain local culture as well.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66265060241 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04691267945 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569277108434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9097435759 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257204382694 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093438282977 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467642910944 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162270085143 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277534685893 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.