Agencies throughout the world tend to recruit their staff with various nationalities. Some schools of thought argue that there are many constructive impacts to having more foreigners in companies, while I totally agree that enterprises are recommended to employ local inhabitants.
The fundamental reason is that communication issues are the extremely crucial points to select employers from other countries. Although foreign working associates can learn the local languages, interactions through the same languages are more efficient than using the other languages. On the other hand, if the working partners come from other nations, they may not have sufficient commitment to work, which means it causes the problems of short term employment. For instance, in Hong Kong, most of the local companies do not have enormous intentions to choose the foreign staffs who spend a short period of work.
At the other side, organizations consider to employ locals with an economic perspective. Small enterprises are preferable to take the responsibilities of improving local economy, which should encouraged by the governments. Moreover, unless there is no choice to seek citizens to work, local people is the first choice. There is an intensive research by Oxford University, it indicates that once the population of local people is less than that of foreigners, local culture would be faded out in 5 years. Regarding maintaining the precious local culture, communities are worth to keep the manpower of local people.
To recapitulate, despite having a plethora of positive outcomes of employing foreign staffs, it is clear that choosing local people to work brings many constructive impacts.
Agencies throughout the world tend to recruit their staff with various nationalities. Some schools of thought argue that there are many constructive impacts to having more foreigners in companies, while I totally agree that enterprises are recommended to employ local inhabitants.
The fundamental reason is that communication issues are the extremely crucial points to select employers from other countries. Although foreign working associates can learn the local languages, interactions through the same languages are more efficient than using the other languages. On the other hand, if the working partners come from other nations, they may not have sufficient commitment to work, which means it causes the problems of short term employment. For instance, in Hong Kong, most of the local companies do not have enormous intentions to choose the foreign staffs who spend a short period of work.
At the other side, organizations consider to employ locals with an economic perspective. Small enterprises are preferable to take the responsibilities of improving local economy, which should encouraged by the governments. Moreover, unless there is no choice to seek citizens to work, local people is the first choice. There is an intensive research by Oxford University, it indicates that once the population of local people is less than that of foreigners, local culture would be faded out in 5 years. Regarding maintaining the precious local culture, communities are worth to keep the manpower of local people.
To recapitulate, despite having a plethora of positive outcomes of employing foreign staffs, it is clear that choosing local people to work brings many constructive impacts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider employing'.
Suggestion: consider employing
...k. At the other side, organizations consider to employ locals with an economic perspective. Sm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'intensive research'.
Suggestion: intensive research
...al people is the first choice. There is an intensive research by Oxford University, it indicates that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51923076923 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01331119845 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638461538462 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2516778146 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.583333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253012656354 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102896299647 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16240584495 0.0667982634062 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236289477444 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.300210795544 0.056905535591 528% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.