Universities should accept equal number of male and female in every subject.
To what extent, do you agree or disagree?
The ancient generations so far now, the society has shaped the sexual discrimination because of the separate biological characteristics. At school, lots of lecturers often ignore the female students with flying color who really want to receptive knowledge called aspects of male. It is absurd to agree with this perception.
On the one hand, there are many reasons coined to explain why the gender unfair still exists in this modern life especially at universities. Firstly, the restlessness stemming from authority figures at these schools when they decide to hand over projects to the female student. Such students often have private reasons, so they cannot spend their whole time sitting in front the computer screen, for which they do not have the capacity of drawing up everything meticulously. Secondly, subjects have been born initially for males always require the persistent and self- sacrifice namely time and energy. If women spend too much time for studying and putting all of their effort into hard researches, they will not have time to marry and remain the stability population size.
On the other hand, it seems to me that these universities all over the world should restrict on increasing the sexual discrimination. The main reason is the sake of all walks of the society. Everyone has their own ability, if they are allowed to carry out whatever they like, they will try their best and give the best result, which contributes to improve nation economic by the best way given by best inhabitants and guarantee the highest quality of life. Another reason is the task of dispelling the misconception about the discrepancy from genders which every corner in the word is calling off.
To sum up, although lots of perfectly plausible reasons posed to persuade me about the sexual discrimination at universities, it seems to me that it is better if we can tackle this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Another reason is the task of dispelling the misconception about the discrepancy ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05769230769 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76165273673 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61858974359 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3365580292 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.384615385 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0709009664831 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0269762033692 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283889275648 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0376639101781 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235903547275 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.