Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
The high speed of economic growth and globalize campaign was driving up the requirement for the huge number of labor. There were many reasons put forward to explain why employers decide to choose those who have the formal academic qualification rather than life experience. It was not purely heartening development.
It was not astonished that those who are the head of enterprises want their employees being postgraduate from universities. First of all, such people would mingling with their fraction of job requested due to their deep knowledge moreover they are also equipped with useful skills resembling with their jobs need, which lead to the satisfaction given by recruiters. Secondly, the formal academic qualifications were totally tangle objects so employers could access their staffs accurately based on all of the word written on it. This was able to guarantee the quality of the labor in all of the period of working jointly.
But the other side of this coin is kindling a negative development for the stabilize society. Lots of people having the good degrees were also facing the tough obstacle to have insight of communicate with others especially dealing with customers, as a result, it could flare up the awful outlook in the client. Moreover, personal qualities were also an integral part of the income and the quality of enterprises, for instance, dishonestly in the work place could pose a serious threat to the prosperous development of any companies.
To sum up, although there were many reasons coined to motivate recruiters took on those who have the formal academic qualifications, it is not a positive development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'mingle'
Suggestion: mingle
...sities. First of all, such people would mingling with their fraction of job requested du...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 498, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...access their staffs accurately based on all of the word written on it. This was able to gu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 584, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...o guarantee the quality of the labor in all of the period of working jointly. But the oth...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... is kindling a negative development for the stabilize society. Lots of people having the good...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, honestly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18796992481 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87938512981 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624060150376 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0584526249 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.454545455 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162869665376 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598827411859 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584389080169 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968792123517 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321124089439 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.