Universities should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree

Traditionally, gender role issue has always discriminated women, and it is considered that some subjects are more suitable for men than women. Due to this attitude, some experts assert that universities should not accept equal members of men and women in every subject. On the other hand, numerous others believe that gender should not affect universities' programs and that the number of females and males who study different subjects should be equal. I strongly agree which the latter opinion because of two reasons which I will explain.
In the past, it was a common custom that women can only do delicate works so, people believed that women could not be successful in some fields. This belief influenced the gender entrance in the number of universities' subjects like engineering. A change has occurred since the industrial revolution in womens' role in society. As a result, a proliferation took place in womens' tendency to study different subjects, so universities' policy should change to this way.
Secondly, it should be noted that the cost of living is rising. Consequently, it becomes mandatory for both family members to work, and both men and women should be educated and skillful. As a result, the universities should give all members of society the same opportunity beyond their sex.
To sum up, I completely agree with the idea of equal women and men studying in every subject for two reasons. Firstly, due to the fact that a change had happened in the outlook about womens' ability and role. Secondly, because of the living costs, which makes an inevitable situation for men and women to be educated for working, so they should have the same chance to enter the university.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
...endency to study different subjects, so universities policy should change to this way. Seco...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en and women to be educated for working, so they should have the same chance to e...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01773049645 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69805961346 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542553191489 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1628751837 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.071428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218442705612 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814224229868 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817995728945 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136011332371 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807253597188 0.056905535591 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.