Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the equal right of males and females and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, universities are thinking about the fact that whether the equal numbers of men and women would be admitted in several subjects or not. In my mind, accepting as many males as females by universities is not fair with respect to differences between abilities of them as well as the numbers of both sexes in the world are not the same.
Obviously, human species consists of males and females, like other mammals. They are far from similar in such enormous aspects as physiology, brain ability, emotions, even creativity, and mental powers. Consequently, it is likely that loads of innovative, competent, and far more intelligent ones, whether male or female, will be deprived from education due to policies of equal number acceptance of each gender. Moreover, the essence of subjects is more suitable to a sex. For instance, women are capable of being successful nurses or men will become stronger miners thanks to their patience and their physical strength, respectively.
In addition, the world’s population cannot be halved into two same size groups based on individual’s gender. Undoubtedly, the lack of balance between both sexes should be taken into consideration, while universities are inclined to develop their students’ admission programs to do with equal numbers of each sex. Meanwhile, diverse disciplines of universities pave the way to accept varied numbers of both genders.
On the other hand, others claims that we shouldn’t lose sight of women’s right. The equity between women and men implies that women can carry out the same stuffs which men have the ability to do. Hence, it makes sense the equal numbers of either men or women should be accepted to pursue their educations.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments about this matter, I opt to support vigorously the idea that accepting variable number of female and males around the four corners of the globe by universities not just reasonable, but also inevitable. Imagine Marie Curie as the most well-known female scientist of previous centuries would not have the opportunity to become a student due to the policy of equality of females and males!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... strength respectively In addition the worlds population cannot be halved into two sa...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...On the other hand others claims that we shouldnt lose sight of womens right The equity b...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, as well as, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0298102981 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66615711086 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558265582656 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 369.0 20.2975951904 1818% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1856.0 106.682146367 1740% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 369.0 20.7667163134 1777% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 147.0 7.06120827912 2082% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294688391145 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.294688391145 0.084324248473 349% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168858332204 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576683733568 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 186.8 13.0946893788 1427% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -303.06 50.2224549098 -603% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 147.2 11.3001002004 1303% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.37 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 26.26 8.58950901804 306% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 149.6 10.1190380762 1478% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 187.0 10.7795591182 1735% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.