Many people believe that universities need to have a balanced number of female and male applicants in each course. Personally, I completely do not support such an idea and find it to be unfair.
Firstly, gender should not be a defining factor for taking a specific course in universities. This notion stands out to be unfair and impractical, as there are more important things to consider in a candidate. To explain more, universities have to continue on the traditional process of students acceptance based on qualifications, intelligence level, and how productive they can be in the chosen subject. For example, it is significatly unfair to reject a qualified women in favour of a man with lower grades and qualificaltions. That is why basing university admissions on merits preserves students' rights and opportunities as well.
Another thing is that having equal propotions of students of both genders is kind of impossible and unrealistic. In other words, as preferrence and tendancy play a huge role in choosing university subjects, many courses are more popular with and suitable for one gender than the other. One real life example is taken from the faculty of pharmacology in Damascus university, as the administration reported that the number of female students was way greater than that of the males. Therefore, gender is an unrealistic critirion for candidates' approval in universities.
In conclusion, accepting students in colleges and universities should never rely on equal number of students of both genders, owing to the fact of impractical. Instead, it is more fair to base this procedure on merits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 467, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...gnificatly unfair to reject a qualified women in favour of a man with lower grades a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly unfair to reject a qualified women in favour of a man with lower grades and qu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, another thing, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23461538462 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20658300317 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0336579703 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.692307692 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226171798283 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713440633052 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075775437232 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143406494535 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469164029832 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.