Nowadays, I believe that universities should give both men and women the same educational opportunities. However, I disagree with the idea of having equal proportions of each gender in every subject.
First, having the same number of student in each gender on all courses is basically unrealistic. Scholar number depends on the favour and the application of each student. Once institution want to divide the number of males and females into the same each class, it would need enough application of each gender. Especially many subjects attract one gender more than other, and it would be impractical to fill courses with equal gender. For example, engineering and electrician are more popular with male student with over sixty per cent of application a year. On the contrary, females are attracted by gently jobs such as secretary, nurse, etc.
Second, it would be unfair if universities based on the number between male and female to select candidates for each courses according to their qualifications. For this purpose, successful achievements depend on the time they spent in order to improve themselves. It is extremely wrong to reject a best candidate just because one gender group of student is bigger than the other, or the average number of each gender have already been full. And that student have to change the course or waiting for next semester to apply in this course.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that universities should give the same educational advantages for both males and females in any course. But it would be not practical to equalize the application of each gender in any course.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 643, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntly jobs such as secretary, nurse, etc. Second, it would be unfair if universiti...
^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...selves. It is extremely wrong to reject a best candidate just because one gender ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10188679245 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80828251681 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535849056604 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.926454949 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.5714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214376694604 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813622967514 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468336081018 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146840607451 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306070606183 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.