University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook. Agree or disagree.
Education is primarily dependant on digital media in today's digital era. However, there is also a belief that excessive dependency of the internet is not good for students. So universities should consider several factors to understand upgrading of which medium is good for students.
To start with, today's world of the internet allows the seamless availability of data. For example, if universities depend on digital media it brings advantages such as quick online evaluation of content, faster availability to students in the form of the ability to download the document from a central server at one click. This will save all time spent in an authentic way of proofreading the content and then print the textbooks. With ever-evolving technology, certain fields have prominent updates every day. Dependency on digital sources allows syllabus upgrades faster and easier.
On the contrary, some sections of educational groups strongly believe that knowledge gained by reading textbooks is well retained and applied by students than knowledge gained by students who depend on digital resources. For example, a recent survey by Michigan University, claims that students who follow their virtual libraries are less focused than those who walk to their campus library. The primary reason for this lack of focus is students are often distracted by notifications from other Apps. The attention span of a student is severely affected by the usage of digital media.
To sum-up, universities must promote the usage of digital media over textbooks for the upgrade of the syllabus. Universities should encourage students and professors to bring the best out of technology. For example, provide handouts to students with tips on best practices such as focus time, during which a student can turn off notifications from other Apps in that slot of learning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
Education is primarily dependant on digital media in todays digital era....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 354, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an authentic way" with adverb for "authentic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ne click. This will save all time spent in an authentic way of proofreading the content and then pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, well, for example, such as, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34020618557 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83527021962 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584192439863 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9715306682 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17745325942 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660037925005 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704761199072 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112081527646 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167199239969 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.