The users of social media, such as facebook, twitter, are replacing face-to-face contact in this century. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Thanks to the advent of technology, many people prefer to use social network such as facebook and twitter as their crucial means of communication throughout recent years. Despite some obvious disadvantages of this trend, I would argue that these are outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, there are two major drawbacks when users live in the virtual world, which not only restricts their direct communications but also adversely affects users’ physical health. Firstly, users of social media tend to express their ideas excellently on the internet in lieu of interacting with others in the real world. In particular, children may undergo many public speaking contests at school, however, they do not know how to deal with the authentic contexts which suddenly take place in their real world. Secondly, there are several detrimental effects on human’s health because the wide range of people work with computers or smart phones for an unhealthy amount time. For example, more and more users may face with eye problem such as short-sighted due to playing with gadgets at all times.
On the other hand, I believe that the benefits in terms of connectivity and business development are more significant than such disadvantages. One reason for this view is that people are able to contact with anyone regardless of where they are. This would bring about outstanding advantages of more convenient access to education and facilitation for information updates. For instance, students have great opportunities to take part in any online courses for improving languages purposes. Another reason is that enterprises will take advantage of social network platform to launch advertising or promotion campaigns. Consequently, business reputation is quickly widespread in the public communities resulting increasing the income significantly.
In conclusion, although there are some weaknesses of using social media, I am convinced that these strengths are superior to the limitations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47557003257 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96558293961 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641693811075 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2991739428 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.071428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195425460637 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566199750942 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396848292835 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106396540795 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385254691666 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.