One of the most contemporary issues that receive concerns from various parts of the world is an alarming rate of images of violence and disasters being disclosed on social media with the aim of luring public attention. In the following paragraphs, the causes could be analyzed with some effects being indicated.
First and foremost, the frequent appearance of traumatic and frightening contents via television could be attributed to some factors that should be taken into consideration. A justification is that depressing and savage news often appeal to viewers’ curiosity, and as a result, various broadcasts produce sensational news to increase Televison rating point. Another trigger is the fact that our society these days has been occurring numerous different kinds of violence which require news channels to air this information to the public.
It is can undeniable that this problem have adverse impacts on individuals, especially young generation. To begin with, prolonged expose to graphic violence may unintentionally stimulate fear in children’s mind which make them become easily hyper or even more frightening, launching the young generations into anti-social behaviours. Moreover, the contents display disasters which might lead to the increase of pessimistic emotions among individuals. Take old people suffering from heart disease as an example. When they watch some negative information about heart attack or the risk of stroke caused by heart disease, they have a tendency to think about death in some cases.
In conclusion, this problem could be provoked by a number of different reasons which might result in several serious consequences. Only when governments and individuals make concerted efforts could this trend be efficiently handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'numerous'.
Suggestion: numerous
...r society these days has been occurring numerous different kinds of violence which require news ch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 7, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'canned'.
Suggestion: canned
...is information to the public. It is can undeniable that this problem have adver...
^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecially young generation. To begin with, prolonged expose to graphic violence may...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, as a result, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62686567164 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99595963165 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65671641791 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1834255942 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0958919676959 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315762620221 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.024679828477 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0522742738476 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285468999454 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.