We have become a disposable society, preferring to buy new products rather than repair existing items.
Why do you think this is? How can this trend be reversed?
These days, economy have developed in a fast way in many countries. People have higher income and the life becomes more comforable. Therefore, they like to buy new products and ready to throw old items away.
There are some reasons in change of society. Firstly, people can earn much more money than the past. Due to economic development, it is easy to find a good job that has many opportunities and high salary. Therefore, people afford to buy many things they want and if facilities become old they will throw it away. Moreover, when they have a lot of money, they will feel lazy to repair old things and new products can help them show their status. The second reason is technological development which causes machines to become old easily. Many facilities are not appropriate in the present conditon, so people have to buy modern facilities to serve in study and work.
However, government can change this trend by some ways. Firstly, government should encourage citizens to save money and avoid wasting by repairing facilities. Which not only helps to decrease the number of rubbishes but also save sources of material using to produce. Secondly, government should raise the level of tax on wasting treament, especially industrial rubbish. Which will affect on awareness of people and instead of throwing away, they will repair items to continuously use.
All in all, a disposable situation becomes more and more popular because of some reasons. Government should have some solutions to prevent this.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a fast way" with adverb for "fast"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
These days, economy have developed in a fast way in many countries. People have higher i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts and ready to throw old items away. There are some reasons in change of soci...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...facilities to serve in study and work. However, government can change this tren...
^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...pecially industrial rubbish. Which will affect on awareness of people and instead of thro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will repair items to continuously use. All in all, a disposable situation becom...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.084 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61222969894 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5775616264 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.7647058824 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7058823529 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174969090689 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570268903895 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444781351797 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10686189963 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203515213525 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.59 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.