Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others.
To what extent is this style of management effective?
Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
These days, many companies compete one another severely to take market share, turnover, customers,…so they really need adequate staffs. Beside that, some employers encourage their staffs by paying extra money. However, whether this is the best way to stimulate employees or not; this essay will discuss the practice and provide some possible solutions.
First of all, giving staffs extra money will bring some benefits if employers can use this way in medium level. For example, employees will have much incentive to work harder if they can reach an achievement to get an deserved bonus. They hope and try their best because they want to earn more money. However, if employers abuse this way, it may have some negative effects. For example, it can be a reason to cause jealousies between employees because they may feel unfair for themselves. Therefore, this lead to big problems in the company. Moreover, some staffs can have wrong think. They will not work if they do not receive extra money; they will omit their responsibility.
Besides that, there are some ways to stimulate enthusiasm of employees. Firstly, employers should provide benefits of work for staffs such as improving solving problem skill, enhance managed ability, having more relationships,…Employees understand the importance of their work, so they will try to complete their work. That is a way to that they can demonstrate their ability as well as position. Secondly, employers can allow them to make a plan themselves. They can be independent, freedom, and make decisions. As a result, they think that they are a part of company and they have to take a responsibility with the company, which enables staffs to work harder.
In conclusion, giving extra money brings some benefits but employers should consider its negative effects. In addition, employers can use some ways of management to gain most effectively
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...o take market share, turnover, customers,…so they really need adequate staffs. Bes...
^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...if they can reach an achievement to get an deserved bonus. They hope and try their...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...; they will omit their responsibility. Besides that, there are some ways to sti...
^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...naged ability, having more relationships,…Employees understand the importance of t...
^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Employees
...ged ability, having more relationships,…Employees understand the importance of their work...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., which enables staffs to work harder. In conclusion, giving extra money brings...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23278688525 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91242784599 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550819672131 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0247179654 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0526315789 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4210526316 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327302651439 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118777822233 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712622476729 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221165827728 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568289364167 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.