Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective? Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
There is some controversial issue about working incentive in most companies whether employers should provide extra money for the staffs who dedicate themselve in special contribution to the company. Some people have an idea against to this. I agree to the certain extent that giving staff extra money is an effective incentive, however there are some negative effects to consider which will be furthered discussed in this essay and I will examine other possible alternative ways to deal with this issue.
The extra money could be realized as an effective incentive for many reasons. First of all, most of people tend to receive money as a return when they work or running a business. It can be reflected since the workers being a candidate in the job applying process. They are all has to negotiate about salary, fixed-bonus, welfare, or other return as much as they can when they join the company. Thus, it is reasonable for employee who do special tasks will expect for extra money. Another point is that most of people, workers and especially salary person might want to have a a healthy financial position among high uncertainty of economic. This is because they have to reserve sufficient money for their future health problems, building up their family, etc.
On the other hand, some people might not focus on a money return but others. Apart from money, some people want to be a respective person, or being a top magagement level in their organization. As a result, extra money can not deal with this situation but job promotion might be more effective. Moreover, giving an extra money might caused a problem in orfanization. There will be high competitive among employees that might bring positive effect to the firm, but it is not sustainable. Working envirionment might be serious and employees might be selffish to each other resulting in high turnover rate of employees.
To summarise, extra money might be an effective incentive for most employees, but this might be an adequate incentive for some people who are a healthy financial person. Lastly, extra money might be an effective and productive way if it is controllable which working environment is still friendly to workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...centive for many reasons. First of all, most of people tend to receive money as a return when ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 503, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
... for extra money. Another point is that most of people, workers and especially salary person m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 575, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: a
...cially salary person might want to have a a healthy financial position among high u...
^^^
Line 2, column 575, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cially salary person might want to have a a healthy financial position among high...
^
Line 2, column 575, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: a; a
...cially salary person might want to have a a healthy financial position among high u...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, still, thus, apart from, as to, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00819672131 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69886721802 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502732240437 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8243161401 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.833333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300503718808 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112851400619 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846657237937 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220466558538 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885298131386 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.