In times of extreme natural conditions, rich countries ought to help developing countries with financial aid. This essay agrees with this statement, firstly, because developed nations could provide essential supplies and secondly, the monetary support would help to restore infrastructure.
Developed countries would assist affected nations with important products and services. When extreme weather strikes, it is a moral duty to help those in need, and offer them the necessary items so they could surpass these hardships. Simple products such as canned food or clean water, along with medical assistance for those with serious health conditions, would make an enormous difference in the lives of those in need. For example, when Indonesia was hit by the tsunami in 2018, it received humanitarian support from the US, who sent multiple planes with food supplies, and doctors to take care of the people who suffered injuries.
Infrastructure would be repaired with external financial aid. After a natural disaster, it is very hard for a country to rebuild all its roads or buildings by itself, and foreign aid would help them to plan the reconstruction budget. By doing so, healthy nations would probably halve the times for reconstruction of the transport infrastructure and, repair or even build new hospitals or educational facilities. For instance, the European Union has the Cohesion Fund, which is specially designed to support poorer countries in times of famine, flood or drought.
In conclusion, first world nations ought to enable less developed countries to receive critical supplies and financial relief to underpin the reconstruction of destroyed infrastructure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...onditions, rich countries ought to help developing countries with financial aid. This essa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54263565891 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93631704947 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612403100775 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.828599195 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220636340334 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879705229959 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617252121356 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129780830586 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199802893911 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.