What is the difference between traditional food and fast food?
Fast food is becoming increasingly popular in many nations these days, attracting a big number of individuals who enjoy it. Because fast food and traditional meals will compete, this is an issue that requires care and concern. People are becoming too reliant on fast food, which causes a slew of problems. Here's some information to help us figure out what's going on. Because a few people have grown so addicted to it that they cannot tell the difference between their farmed food and prepared culinary goods.
First and foremost, it is a problem with dietary nutrients. Because this traditional diet has the perfect quantity of nutrients that people require to thrive. Compare and contrast a dinner rich in meat, vegetables, eggs, fish, and tubers with one rich in fried, grilled, and fatty dishes. Traditional foods include a wide spectrum of nutrients that safeguard and improve the body's health. Fast food has an excessive amount of fat and protein.
Second, it's time to get the food ready. Clearly, making a traditional dinner takes longer and requires more effort than preparing a fast food meal. You can definitely get a portion of hot fast food for a reasonable price at fast-food restaurants. It is both quick and convenient. People are continually scrambling to try in today's world, and eating is no longer as crucial as it once was.
Last but not least, there's the issue of national identity. Fast food has a detrimental impact on national identity. Each traditional meal has its own distinct flavor profile. Fast food is notorious for its excessive salt, fat, and sugar content, as well as additional additives, especially for a traditional meal that stresses variety and richness in flavor, palate, and choice. consume a lot of meat, such as chicken and beef Traditional cuisines are various and diversified when fast food is made and prepared for time-consuming diners who wish to quench their thirst.
In conclusion, there is no objection to our absorbing fresh information in order to integrate the country with the rest of the globe. And quick food isn't all that horrible. However, you need to have a better understanding and not overdo it because you won't be able to consume solely fast food every day, month, or year. Let us make wise and educated decisions, rather than allowing ourselves to be pushed into a harmful lifestyle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
... some information to help us figure out whats going on. Because a few people have gro...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 61, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...it is a problem with dietary nutrients. Because this traditional diet has the perfect q...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'thriving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: thriving
...antity of nutrients that people require to thrive. Compare and contrast a dinner rich in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 21, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...al as it once was. Last but not least, theres the issue of national identity. Fast fo...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 379, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consume
...richness in flavor, palate, and choice. consume a lot of meat, such as chicken and beef...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...h the rest of the globe. And quick food isnt all that horrible. However, you need to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98218829517 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70915302808 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595419847328 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0581221868 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5833333333 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.20833333333 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.493192446216 0.244688304435 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126111251023 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100043468865 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263155259478 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956685931533 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.