in what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
These days, technology has a pivotal role in people’s lives, especially in their relationships with each other and in different areas. This essay consists of some information about how technology affects people’s relationships.
To begin with, technology makes people closer to each other. To illustrate, they can contact their friends and family anywhere and anytime they decide. Some of the special ways, which the technology originates them, that people can utilize to have easier connections together are social media. All people can use social media to connect easily to their family and relatives even if they are living in another city or country. For instance, I have some experience in using technology to be connected with my relatives. My family is originally from another city and when I want to call them, I just use social media; because it is cheaper and I can use my laptop or another device even I do not have my cell-phone around.
The second impact of technology on people’s relationships is that they can communicate with all the people around the globe and make a new relationship. Besides, they can widespread their connection and it can be very beneficial in different ways; like for their career or special group of people like tourists.
According to the former paragraph, I believe technology is dreadful more than society can sense. It improved the quality of life and the level of people’s social behavior. Accordingly, this social behavior and connection with using technology can improve people’s business connections and help them to grow. Thus, I think, technology is beneficial and has a positive impact on different relationships.
In conclusion, technology can keep families and friends closer and improve the life quality of society. In one word, it can make the globe to one community in different locations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 153, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...amily anywhere and anytime they decide. Some of the special ways, which the technology orig...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, if, second, so, thus, for instance, i think, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92517046037 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5709926034 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226248037545 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965336014776 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845542086682 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152761399734 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063434940643 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.