When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
These days technology has become a cardinal part of people’s lives. It would be hard to imagine our lives without smartphones and computers. As technology is becoming ubiquitous traditional skills such as weaving are vanishing. Many individuals assert that there is no need to preserve these skills and culture; however, I completely disagree with this assertion as it would take away a nation’s identity in the long run.
To embark with, cultural values of a country provide discrete identity to the country on a global scale. Numerous nations still sustain their heritage and culture as without these elements they might lose their originality. For instance, most of the nations celebrate their Independence Day or other festivals which have certain historic value. If these values are not maintained countrymen may become unaware of the glory of their nations and war heroes. Therefore, efforts should be made in order to keep the culture alive.
In addition, conventional skills have the same level of importance. Skills such as weaving, pottery oak basket making should be sustained. Certainly, machines can outperform humans in these tasks, but it does not mean that individuals should forget these skills. A machine can never match the precision of a human mind. To exemplify, Indian weavers are still in huge demand due to their adroit weaving skills. Hence, if a state put some effort in keeping their traditional skills alive, it can obtain some significant benefits.
To conclude, even though a high tech country can be regarded as a successful and powerful, without preserving its culture and traditional values any country can lose their real identity and makes the entire progress futile.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
These days technology has become a cardinal part o...
^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y and makes the entire progress futile.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32967032967 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77548859772 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622710622711 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1454247405 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9375 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113235195099 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363702761562 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400659129174 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699603904896 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.010012997128 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.