When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion

Essay topics:

When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

When a nation builds up its technology, traditional skills and culture fade away, and some argue it is absolutely not worth a while to still preserve them. This essay disagrees with this view.

It is of value and importance that a nation preserves its cultural skills and way of life despite technological advances because it stands as a part of history to the development of the society. When traditional cultures and skills are safely preserved, younger generations are able to learn and are not denied the opportunity to know how the society has progressed. The historical knowledge of a traditional way of live will act a point of reference for future works and engagements in the society.

Another positive reason for preserving a cultural skill and way of life in spite of technology development is that it can serve as a means of revenue for the society by attracting tourist globally. Perhaps, consequent of a nations unique traditional way of life and skill, this can bring foreigners from different countries to come and experience first hand. Ultimately, through this medium the government is able to get a lot of money from this cultural attraction. For instance, according to the 2019 report from the Nigerian Foreign Minister, cultural artefacts and skills were mainly responsible for 80% of tourist attraction to the country and 20% for other purposes.

In conclusion, a nation keeping its traditional skill and culture and not letting it die out is crucial because it will serve as history purposes and also a medium of revenue for the society by attracting tourist.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-28 InamAli 84 view
2023-01-20 Guiseppe59192 73 view
2021-04-28 sattar_iust 89 view
2021-04-04 maryyrle 67 view
2021-02-03 Amnusheenh 73 view
Essays by user phil999 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05323193916 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91448773347 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528517110266 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.365357976 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.9 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265850038617 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114235481331 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497235729347 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170653869869 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269244236612 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.