Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weakness. Is it right to exclude males and females from certain professions because of their gender?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
It is widely accepted that the strengths of women and men, in terms of both physicality and mentality vary significantly. Indisputably, there are many studies that indicate this difference and vouch for this universal belief. Nevertheless, there is no existence of substantial evidence that carters to the view that employment should be based on gender. Thus, it is not surprising to disagree with the conventional ideologies of encouraging definite occupations for both men and women.
Firstly, considering physical strength, it is deeply rooted misogyny against women who posses a body structure constituted of muscles and rough outlook that hampered the efforts made by the female population from building their bodies on par with men. The existence of athletes competing in women's weight lifting, boxing, street fighting, football, cricket and a myriad of sports depicts that women are not inferior to men on the basis of stamina or physical durability.
Furthermore, every domain across the world paints women to be docile, compliant and flexible, while a man is portrayed as more capable and stable. To illustrate, a study in 2010 asked a panel of interviewers to analyze the resumes of a man and women who have identical qualities and background. The panel praised the man for his achievements and management skills, while the woman was dismissed to be an over-achiever and controlling. This example summarizes the consequences of baseless entertained and propagated by people. Accordingly, the population created distinctions among the different genders, thus, restricting their accessibility to more feminine or masculine jobs.
In conclusion, though there are many biological differences that help mankind in discerning men and women, there is no proven hypothesis that warrant the division of labor or professions depending on the sex of people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en to be docile, compliant and flexible, while a man is portrayed as more capable...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48083623693 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14863456862 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613240418118 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4121263204 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.083333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174264308917 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554009003444 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029607087874 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975178661978 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231432302995 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.