The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same work or the same work conditions for life. Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare for people to work in the future.
The world of employment is remaining unstable and requires high work performance. So having the same work or the same work conditions is no longer suitable. There are several factors neither solution for employees in order to prepare for the future.
This can be attributed to 2 mainly reasons. Initially, the customer’s demand is rising and becoming complicated, they want expensive and high-quality products. Consequence, enterprises and companies have to pursue the innovations and enhance their services. Beside, their recruitment is challenging because they have to choose the best employee with employable skills, who are solution-driven and self-sufficient. Secondly, the market is competitive and hostile, without constantly improving, enterprises and companies can’t exist and adaptable. They encourage their employees gain more experiences and profession in the works, and devote the most for their companies.
Whereas the world of work is shifting at a very fast pace, people especially those have just graduated should make a preparation before entering the workforce. First of all, as a student in the university, they can get used to the working environment from internship. As a result, there is less confusion when they enter the real workforce. In addition, employees must understand themselves, what are their favorite jobs, where are their capacity, etc. Some people states that to be successful, do the work that you are the best. However, others argue that follow the passion, you will do the job well when you passionate. All in all, unless employees don’t have themselves comprehension, they wouldn’t find the suitable jobs.
To summarize, the employment grows up due to the innovations and competitions between enterprises. Meanwhile, employee always has to get effort for successful career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...e best employee with employable skills, who are solution-driven and self-sufficient. Se...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ite jobs, where are their capacity, etc. Some people states that to be successful...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, as to, in addition, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63669064748 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21365585836 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629496402878 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7101740898 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0555555556 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4444444444 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286608656713 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837819116805 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10716621105 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193560814605 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181609174075 0.056905535591 319% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.