You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money.
Do you agree or disagree?
Which other types of job should be highly paid?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Some people believe that celebrities such as movie stars, music makers, and sports players are highly paid. In my opinion, I agree with this aforementioned statement. Moreover, some other types of professions should be getting high salaries, including scientists, doctors, and teachers.
Indeed, entertainers are classified among one of the best jobs all over the world. Furthermore, they get too much money from both producers and sponsors as well as their activity on social media applications. For instance, a famous football player has been well-paid for his last advertising campaign for a well-known shaving brand. Therefore, it is accurate that actors, musicians, and athletics are greatly appreciated when it comes to their incomes.
On the contrary, others, more important, but unfortunately much less appreciated people are financially struggling, such as health care workers, science researchers, or teachers. Besides, they do not even have half the amount of money given to those entertainers. However, they spend more than half of their ages studying and working. For example, the health workforce, namely, doctors and nurses, who have to work for long hours or may have night shifts staying away from their families to deal with several patients under high pressure. Consequently, these people have significant roles in their society, but their financial worth is underestimated.
In conclusion, some individuals feel that those entertainers, whose jobs are either making a film or an album, are getting high salaries. Similarly, I think the same too. Nevertheless, scientists, the medical staff, and the teaching staff should be paid more than what they currently get due to their important value.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52272727273 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97582662081 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689393939394 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8796766157 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4666666667 7.06120827912 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221494796363 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662701927713 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464321776397 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137866497215 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638423501329 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.