You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic.
It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.
What are advantages and disadvantages of this development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Nowadays, people are able to go on a trip to remote natural environment for several reasons like researching or travelling. This then gives both positive and negative aspects on the environment and people on this continent.
There are a number of advantages when people choose to travel to remote natural environment. First, it could help increase the knowledge about places where we haven't known before. Scientists will be the one who discover these new areas and try to provide as much as possible the information about this to people to help preserve the habitats if they are in danger and develop it if the natural environment is worth being known internationally. Furthermore, it would be a new tourist attraction and help increase the interested rate of tourism of the government to these remote places. There are several people who want to go to these places as an adventure trip, which provide more money for tourism and hospitality of the country.
However, if people tend to use these natural resources too much, it could destroy the natural environment. Although tourism could help develop the areas to become an interesting places for living and travelling, they might partly decrease the beauty of the natural environment by throwing trash or just building as many hotels as possible to create more profits. Moreover, maybe after the scientists publish new information about these places, there will be some businesses and thieves who want to collect all the natural resources, decline the quality of the environment and kill animals to develop themselves or sell it for profit. Thus, all of the actions could lead to the destruction of non-renewable resources and natural habitats for other animals.
In conclusion, although choosing to travel to remote natural environment could benefit the areas by preserving the resources on time or developing it as tourist places, if people, include scientist and tourists, overuse these areas, the remote natural environment would be destroyed because of human activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ase the knowledge about places where we havent known before. Scientists will be the on...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'place'?
Suggestion: place
...elop the areas to become an interesting places for living and travelling, they might p...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 641, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...themselves or sell it for profit. Thus, all of the actions could lead to the destruction o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24539877301 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84885939447 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490797546012 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.5560663193 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.5 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239255304103 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959230614056 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510881255382 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16365050094 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143935716894 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.