You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Business organisations should hire employees for their entire lives.
Do you agree or disagree?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people believe that if staffs were employed for the lifetime, it would provide businesses with excellent, experienced and highly knowledgeable specialists. However, I personally disagree with this view for some reasons.
On the one hand. This kind of recruiting brings some drawbacks to the organizations. Firstly, it will eliminate the competitive element, which whips up many people to improve their professional performance. the employees have less motivation to work and this leads to lower productivity and fewer profits for the company. Secondly, the employees whom to be hired for a decade back may not have enough aptitude to deal with the latest technologies and that will decrease the competition power in the market. Thirdly, in case of restructuring, it will increase the labor expenses when hiring new and the most suitable workers without dismissing the existing ones.
On the other hand, there are some problems with candidates when signing a lifetime contract. First of all, they have to completely follow the company policy, even changing branch or working conditions whether you are ready or not. Secondly, the employees may be treated unequally about benefit packages and promotion opportunities. In fact, workers often get promoted according to their seniority rather than talents and abilities. Finally, avoiding increasing labor expenses when applying this kind of recruitment, the companies just hire a certain number of employees so that everyone may have to work overtime, which will affect to their health conditions and social relationships.
In conclusion, I would like to say that hiring employees for a lifetime is not a practical strategy in business. The entire life employment approach could be a drawback for the organization as well as the employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...improve their professional performance. the employees have less motivation to work ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45878136201 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00263883634 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627240143369 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8147439524 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.533333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153082778865 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477947380181 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292362116803 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926320864305 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00569866719413 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.