Young people today are better qualified than they were in the past Some people argue that this is because competition for jobs is greater than it used to be Others say that people only continue their education because the opportunities exist for them to d

Obtaining a satisfying job is one of the major objectives in human life. However, the qualification for the job is higher than in the past for the young people. For this situation, certain people believe that it is due to the fact that has employment has been more competitive, while others reckon that because people continue to further study. From my perspective, I completely agree that the competition for job nowadays is more intense than before, and my opinions would be elaborated as follows.

People believe nowadays the increasing competition is the reason for the higher qualification of work. In the present time, since the rapid growth of population, more and more people are contending for few numbers of job vacancies. Consequently, the requirements for entering the job would be higher correspondingly. To demonstrate, in the past centuries, people who graduate from an ordinary university or college are qualified by the employers. In contrast, currently, people in need of more exceptional performance of their background, such as related working and internship experience and possessing professional licenses to be hired.

On the other hand, it is often argued that people continue on their education in order to have better opportunities to be employed. Instead of gaining a bachelor degree from university, people spare no effort to pursue a master degree recently. For illustration, it is common to see that people who study management in the university would spend additional two years to obtain a master degree in order to have a more outstanding academic background.

By way of conclusion, as argued above, I utterly consent that the higher qualification of employment nowadays are mainly because of the increasingly vigorous competition.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (3 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, while, in contrast, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35842293907 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1969357189 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4868625388 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40067116325 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139108658745 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812328270943 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216532203532 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101939448249 0.056905535591 179% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.