Zoos have been the centres of amusing and education about animals for centuries as the containment animals in zoos have become a controversial issue among environmentalists. While some argue that confining animals in cages is both necessary and healthy, others refute it. This essay will discuss why to restrict animals in cages can be unfavourable, but why this action helps them to Survive.
Proponents of this idea that animals have the right to freedom just like humans have been increasing. Indeed, they believe that animals should behave according to their instinct and maintenance them in zoos is harmful to their health as well as sometimes lead them to be depressing. For instance, the results of an investigation on the behaviour of animals show that animals who live in restriction are less happy rather than their free congeners; they sit in a place calmly without any movement, and they lose their appetite as they seem depression. For these reasons, some claim that the practice of keeping animals in zoos is an unethical activity.
On the contrary, many believe keeping animals in a zoo is reasonable since this is a way to save many species from the danger of extinct. For example, the London zoo has excellent breeding programs to reproduce and protection the rare kinds of animals. Hence, conservation of animals has provided a rational reason to limit them in zoos.
The maintenance animals in zoos was always a challenging issue. This essay considered although animals in zoos can be uncomfortable, but why this act is necessary to provide a safe environment to prevent them from the verge of extinction. After looking at both side of this argument, it is felt that keeping animals in zoos superior despite some disadvantages is there.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, look, so, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04467353952 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87472192895 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553264604811 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6658586181 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.923076923 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29852596648 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113210479124 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589019933911 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193405799013 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054073491481 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.